In August 2026 we quoted one Springfield, Oregon household with five carriers inside the same week. Three vehicles, two drivers, comparable limits, and a house on two of the five. The annualized auto premiums ran from $2,040 to $3,339.
That is $1,299 a year of difference for the same coverage on the same cars. And the cheapest one was not a bundle.
This is a real comparison with the client’s name, address and vehicle identification details removed and the actual quote figures kept in. It is one household. It is not an average, and it is not a Springfield rate.
The household we quoted
Three vehicles: a full-size pickup, a compact SUV and a mid-size SUV. All three on pleasure use with low annual mileage, between 3,500 and 6,000 miles a year depending on the vehicle and the carrier’s banding. Two married drivers, both over 65, no youthful operators on the policy. The driving record was not clean. It carried a recent at-fault accident and a moving violation, and every carrier saw both.
On the home side, a house built within the last ten years with a dwelling limit in the $900,000 to $1,000,000 band and a $1,000 all-peril deductible.
That profile matters. Low mileage and mature drivers pull a premium down. An at-fault accident and a violation push it back up, and carriers weigh those very differently from one another. That disagreement is most of the spread you are about to see.
Read the term before you read the price
This is the part that trips people up, so it comes first. Two of the five auto quotes were written for a six month policy period and three were written for twelve.
The GEICO quote says $1,020. The Safeco quote says $3,339. Set side by side with no adjustment, GEICO looks like roughly a third of the price. It is not. The GEICO figure buys six months and the Safeco figure buys twelve.
Here is the same set of quotes with every premium put on a twelve month basis.
| Carrier | Premium as quoted | Policy term | Annualized | Paid in full |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GEICO | $1,020.00 | 6 months | $2,040.00 | $975.00 per term |
| Travelers | $2,480.00 | 12 months | $2,480.00 | $2,364.00 |
| The Hartford | $1,306.00 | 6 months | $2,612.00 | Included in quote |
| Encompass | $3,093.20 | 12 months | $3,093.20 | $3,093.20 |
| Safeco | $3,339.00 | 12 months | $3,339.00 | $2,965.00 |
The arithmetic is not complicated. GEICO’s $1,020 covers six months, so twelve months is $2,040. The Hartford’s $1,306 covers six months, so twelve months is $2,612. The other three were already annual.
Notice what annualizing does to the ranking. On the raw numbers The Hartford at $1,306 reads as the second cheapest quote in the group. Annualized, it is third, and it is $572 a year more than GEICO rather than $286 less. Nothing about the quote changed. Only the basis of comparison did.
One more note on The Hartford figure, because it is easy to get wrong. The Hartford quoted the auto and a personal umbrella on the same document, and the document’s headline total of $1,574 includes both. The auto alone is $1,306 for the six month term, which is the sum of the three vehicle premiums. The umbrella is handled separately below, because putting it inside an auto comparison would overstate The Hartford’s auto price by $268 a term.
The finding: bundling did not win here
The lowest auto premium on this account came from a standalone policy.
GEICO quoted the auto only, at $2,040 annualized. Travelers quoted the auto as half of a home and auto package, at $2,480. Encompass quoted the auto as half of its own package, at $3,093.20. The standalone policy beat the cheaper of the two bundled autos by $440 a year and the dearer one by $1,053.20.
That is the opposite of what most people are told, so it is worth being precise about why it can happen.
On most personal lines accounts, no other discount moves the number as much as putting the home and the cars with one company. Both bundle quotes here carried that credit, and the Travelers home quote alone showed $1,635 of discounts applied. But a discount is applied to that carrier’s own rate for your risk. If the underlying rate is high, a large discount on a high number can still finish above a carrier with a lower starting rate and no bundle credit at all. That is what happened here. The at-fault accident and the violation were priced very differently across these five carriers, and those differences were larger than the multi-policy credit.
None of that makes bundling a bad idea, and on plenty of accounts we place it is the right answer. It makes bundling a thing to test rather than assume. The only way to know which way your account goes is to price the standalone auto against the packaged auto and look at both.
The two bundles were nearly tied, and built oppositely
Two of the five carriers quoted the whole account. On the total, they finished within $221.20 of each other.
| Encompass | Travelers | |
|---|---|---|
| Home, 12 months | $2,310.00 | $2,702.00 |
| Auto, 12 months | $3,093.20 | $2,480.00 |
| Bundle total | $5,403.20 | $5,182.00 |
Read the two lines above the total and the tie stops looking like a tie. Encompass was $392 cheaper on the home. Travelers was $613.20 cheaper on the auto. The two gaps very nearly cancel, which is the only reason the totals land close.
That matters more than a $221.20 difference suggests, because the two halves of a personal lines account do not move together. Home rates in this valley have been driven by reconstruction cost and wildfire exposure. Auto rates move on the driving record, and the accident and violation on this record will age off. A package that is cheap today because of its auto side and a package that is cheap today because of its home side will not stay tied.
Both home quotes were built on nearly the same dwelling limit, a $1,000 all-peril deductible and $500,000 of personal liability. Encompass carried $50,000 of water backup with a separate $2,500 water backup deductible, priced as a visible $402 line item. Travelers included water backup at $50,000 and limited hidden water seepage at $20,000 inside its package rather than as a separate charge. Same headline coverage, different construction, and only one of them shows you the price of it.
This is the same pattern we found on a homeowners comparison in Albany, where three quotes landed within about $42 a year of each other and the policies behind them were not close at all. Nearly tied on price, very different underneath, is the normal result rather than the surprising one.
The limits were comparable, not identical
Every quote here was built to the same brief: $500,000 of bodily injury protection, $100,000 of property damage, $500,000 of uninsured motorist coverage and $500 comprehensive and collision deductibles on all three vehicles. All five delivered that in substance. Three of them delivered it in a different structure.
GEICO, The Hartford and Travelers quoted split limits: $500,000 per person and $500,000 per accident for bodily injury, with property damage as its own $100,000 limit. Encompass and Safeco quoted a $500,000 combined single limit instead, one pot of money covering bodily injury and property damage together for the whole loss.
Neither structure is wrong. They behave differently in a bad claim. A combined single limit can be more flexible when one injury is catastrophic, because it is not capped per person. Split limits can reach further when several people are hurt in the same crash, because each person has access to the per person limit and property damage does not draw on the same pool at all.
Two other lines moved between the quotes. Uninsured motorist property damage ran from $20,000 on the GEICO quote up to $100,000 on The Hartford, Travelers and Encompass. Personal injury protection ran from the $15,000 Oregon requires up to $35,000 on the Encompass quote. Those are small premium items and they are not small at claim time.
If you are comparing your own quotes, this is the check to run before you look at the price at all. Confirm whether each one is split limits or a combined single limit, and confirm the uninsured motorist and personal injury protection lines separately. Our method for comparing auto insurance quotes walks through it line by line.
The umbrella belongs in its own column
The Hartford also quoted a $1,000,000 personal umbrella with a $1,000 retained limit at $268. None of the other four carriers quoted an umbrella on this account, so it is not part of any comparison above and it is not blended into The Hartford’s auto number anywhere on this page.
It is worth mentioning on its own terms. $268 buys a million dollars of liability sitting above the auto and home policies. Against annual auto premiums running past $3,000 on this same account, that is a small number for the largest single increment of protection available on a personal lines account. Whether it is the right buy depends on assets and exposure, not on price. It is priced here because the quote exists and the figure is real.
What this comparison actually shows
Four things hold up beyond this one household.
Carriers disagree with each other far more than most people expect. Same three vehicles, same two drivers, same record, same week, and the annualized spread was $1,299. Nothing about the risk changed between quotes. Only the carrier’s view of it did.
Policy term is part of the price. A six month premium is not a cheaper premium, it is half a year of one. Two of these five quotes were six month terms, and one of them looked like the bargain of the group until it was annualized.
Bundling is a test, not a rule. On this account the standalone auto won, and it was not close. The multi-policy credit was real and it still lost to a lower starting rate.
And a near tie on a total is usually two different policies. The two bundles finished $221.20 apart and were built in opposite directions underneath. If we had only shown the household the two totals, they would have flipped a coin on a decision that was not a coin flip.
What this comparison does not show
It does not show a typical Springfield premium, or a typical Eugene one. It is one household with a specific vehicle mix, a specific driving record and a house at a specific value. A household with a clean record, or one car instead of three, or a $400,000 house instead of one near a million, would produce a different set of numbers and possibly a different winner.
It also does not say anything about how these carriers price generally, or what they will do at renewal, or how they handle claims. It says what five carriers quoted for one risk in August 2026. Quotes age quickly, and rate filings change. By the time you read this, the same five carriers on the same risk could rank differently.
For the coverage itself without the comparison framing, auto insurance in Eugene and Springfield covers Oregon’s required limits and what moves a premium in Lane County, and home insurance in Eugene covers the wildfire disclosure rules and rebuild timelines that apply to a house here.
Questions to ask before you compare two quotes
Ask what term each premium covers, and put both on the same basis before you look at either number. Ask whether the liability is split limits or a combined single limit. Ask what the uninsured motorist limits are, both bodily injury and property damage, because Oregon requires one and not the other. Ask what personal injury protection is set at. Ask what the comprehensive and collision deductibles are on each vehicle, not on the policy. And if you are being quoted a bundle, ask for the standalone auto price from the same carrier and from at least one carrier that is not quoting your home.
About this example
The figures on this page come from five quote documents Vantage Point Risk ran for one household in Springfield, Oregon in August 2026, with effective dates in August 2026. The client’s name, street address, vehicle identification numbers, policy and quote numbers and contact details are removed, and the vehicle mix and dwelling value are described generically with the client’s approval. The carrier names and the actual premium and coverage figures stay in, because a comparison with its numbers stripped out is not a comparison. They are not here to rank one insurer against another. Because pricing and eligibility depend on the specific drivers, vehicles, record, home and carrier, read this as a demonstration of the method and of how far apart carriers can land, not as a price you should plan around.
Not sure your current limits are right? Compare your coverage. Ready to see your own five carrier table? Get a quote.