Hablamos Español Insurance Companies We Work With
Home›Learning Center›Article
Learning Center

PURE vs Openly: Membership Economics Against a Published Rulebook

By . Reviewed for insurance accuracy by Hugo Canizales, licensed agent, NPN 17110369. Published September 24, 2026. How we review this

Already know you need this? Get a quote Compare your coverage →

PURE and Openly land on the same shortlist more often than you’d expect. Usually it’s because a household’s reconstruction estimate has climbed past the point where an ordinary policy fits. They aren’t two versions of the same thing. One asks you to join a member owned exchange, sign a power of attorney and put up capital. The other sells a policy on a published rulebook, with a hard ceiling and a state list you can read for yourself.

What follows is what each one publishes, with dates. No winner gets named here. The answer depends on the house, the state, and whether you want the membership economics at all.

What each one actually is

PURE is an insurance company. PURE Insurance is the marketing name for Privilege Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange, a Florida domiciled reciprocal insurer, meaning a company owned by its own policyholders. PURE defines a reciprocal exchange in its own glossary as “an unincorporated association in which members (as individuals, partnerships, trustees, or corporations) exchange contracts and pay premiums through an attorney-in-fact for the insurance of each other.” The attorney-in-fact is PURE Risk Management, LLC. PURE describes it as a for-profit entity serving as its attorney-in-fact for a fee. It’s a subsidiary of Privilege Underwriters, Inc., a member of the Tokio Marine Group of Companies. Tokio Marine completed the acquisition in February 2020.

Openly isn’t one. Openly LLC states in its own disclosure that it “is a general agency and program administrator offering homeowners insurance policies underwritten by unaffiliated insurers through its network of independent agency partners. Each insurer is solely responsible for the claims on its policies and pays Openly for policies sold.” Openly is domiciled in Delaware, with its principal place of business in Boston. Ty Harris and Matt Wielbut founded it in 2017.

Two admitted companies, meaning companies licensed by the state, hold Openly’s paper. Rock Ridge Insurance Company, NAIC 11089, part of Clear Blue Insurance Group. And MS Transverse Insurance Company, NAIC 21075, part of MS and AD Insurance Group. MS Transverse writes in six states, all of them Rock Ridge states too.

Membership, and what it actually costs

Three things happen with PURE that don’t happen when you buy through a program administrator.

You sign a legal instrument. PURE states that membership requires an executed Subscriber’s Agreement and Power of Attorney.

You contribute capital. PURE states that members “are required to contribute surplus (capital), in addition to paying premiums, for their first five years of membership,” calculated as a small percentage of premium. That’s a cost of entry. It sits apart from your premium and apart from the savings account.

You get a Subscriber Savings Account, which PURE defines as “a notional account held for each active PURE member, reflecting their individual share of PURE’s policyholder surplus.” PURE’s own conditions:

  • Allocations “are made at the discretion of management, based on the performance of the business and require regulatory approval,” specifically by the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation.
  • The accounts “remain on PURE’s balance sheet, available to pay claims if necessary. Because of this, SSA balances could decrease.”
  • You can’t get at the funds on demand, and balances don’t earn interest.
  • PURE states it “has made an allocation in 11 of our past 20 years in business.”

Openly has none of this, which is rather the point of it. No membership, no power of attorney, no surplus contribution, nothing to allocate. Openly states an agent can generate a quote in as little as 15 seconds from name, date of birth and address.

A reciprocal really does return surplus to members in a way a program administrator can’t. Still, weigh PURE on coverage, service and price first, and treat a savings account credit as upside that may or may not show up. Anybody selling it to you as a guaranteed return hasn’t read PURE’s own page.

Three PURE entities, and the sentence that undoes the pitch

There are three PURE entities, and only one of them carries membership.

PURE, legally Privilege Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange, the Florida domiciled admitted reciprocal. That’s the one with membership and a Subscriber Savings Account.

PURE Specialty Exchange, an Arizona domiciled domestic surplus lines reciprocal introduced in March 2022, with its own attorney-in-fact. Surplus lines means the company isn’t licensed in your state the way an admitted one is. PURE describes its high value homeowners product as designed for coastal and wildfire exposed areas, short-term rentals and other challenging risk profiles requiring up to $50M in coverage. Because it’s surplus lines, it requires verified diligent effort, meaning somebody has to show the licensed companies were asked first.

PURE Programs, LLC, a managing general underwriter introduced in January 2017. It arranges the non-admitted business: coastal and wildfire exposed homes, homes rented to others, homes under construction, non-standard homeowners and excess liability, and flood.

Now the sentence. PURE Programs states in its own footer that “policies arranged by PURE Programs may not confer the benefits of being a reciprocal exchange member including Subscriber or Member Savings Accounts.” So if the membership economics are why you’re looking at PURE, and your quote comes through PURE Programs, the thing you came for may not be in the policy you’re handed. Ask which entity is issuing.

Surplus lines paper also has no state guaranty fund behind it, and it doesn’t go through the same form and rate filing rules admitted paper does. Both of Openly’s companies are admitted. That’s a real structural difference.

Settlement terms, where one side publishes and the other doesn’t

Most comparison articles quietly invent something here. We’d rather say what’s missing.

Openly publishes its terms. Guaranteed replacement cost, its own words, capped at $5 million: “Guaranteed replacement coverage up to $5M*”. The consumer explanation is that your home will be rebuilt even if the cost exceeds your initial policy limits.

The asterisk is Openly’s, and it matters: “In CT, GA, KS, MS, MO, NH, OH, SC, TN and WI, coverage amount is subject to Coverage A and conditions listed in the policy.” In those ten states the guarantee has a ceiling. Compare it against a competitor’s extended replacement cost endorsement rather than reading it as unlimited. Oregon isn’t on that list.

Openly’s other published limits: liability up to $1 million; blanket personal property up to $100,000 per category on a replacement cost basis, meaning what it costs to buy the item new rather than its depreciated value; mold remediation up to $10,000 and mold liability up to $50,000; concealed water seepage up to $20,000; refrigerated property up to $5,000; tree removal up to $5,000 per occurrence. Optional coverages include home-sharing, equipment breakdown, water backup, buried service lines and personal cyber. Openly writes an HO-5 for primary and secondary homes and a modified HO-3 for homes rented to others. It insures up to nine rental properties, each on its own policy.

There’s a hard ceiling published too. For new business in Connecticut, Delaware, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin, total insured value is capped at $6M. Openly defines that as the replacement cost estimate, or dwelling in stated value states, plus other structures, personal property and loss of use.

On PURE, there’s a gap, and we’re naming it rather than filling it. Our primary PURE material doesn’t contain PURE’s own wording for its dwelling settlement basis, its liability limits or its personal property terms. We won’t describe those from general knowledge or off a comparison site. Ask for the policy form and read the dwelling settlement provision on each quote. See extended versus guaranteed replacement cost and replacement cost versus actual cash value for what you’re looking for.

Eligibility, and one word that changes the answer

PURE publishes a threshold on its own quote button, and the exact wording carries the whole point: “PURE is designed exclusively for homes insured for $1 million or more.”

Read that as a reconstruction figure rather than a listing price. Around here the two numbers pull apart hard, and in both directions. An older house on a valuable lot can sell well above a million and insure for less than that. A custom build on cheap land runs the other way. Dwelling coverage versus market value covers why they drift.

Openly publishes no dwelling minimum at all. Its high value framing is a definition rather than a threshold: a high-value home typically has a replacement cost significantly higher than standard properties due to its size, location, materials, or custom features. Its agent page describes the HO-5 target as modern, well-maintained primary and secondary homes.

Availability, including the Washington problem

One of these two tells you where it writes. The other doesn’t.

Openly publishes its list. Its companies write in 24 states as of September 2026: Alabama, Arizona, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia and Wisconsin. Idaho shows on Openly’s agent page as coming soon, and that status can change without a press release. Washington is not on Openly’s list.

PURE publishes no admitted state list. We checked its About, Financial Strength, Reciprocal Model, Subscriber Savings Account and Risk Management pages, and there isn’t one. What PURE does publish is that its Wildfire Mitigation Program is available to members in a list of states including Idaho, Oregon and Washington. So there are members in those states. That’s a list of who gets a service, and it tells you nothing about where PURE is licensed or what it has decided to write.

A second PURE list does exist. PURE Specialty Exchange is the surplus lines side, and its high value homeowners coverage goes out through PURE Programs. The March 19, 2024 PURE Programs announcement names the states where that coverage was made available. Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Montana, Utah and Wyoming were added at that time, alongside Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Mississippi, North Carolina, New Jersey and South Carolina. Oregon, Washington and Idaho appear nowhere on it. We found no published PURE Specialty Exchange or PURE Programs state list that includes any of the three. Two qualifiers travel with that. The list is dated, and a surplus lines program can add a state without announcing it, so re-check it rather than trusting it as current. And a name missing from a published list just means nothing was published. It says nothing about what any company would do with a particular address. Retrieved September 23, 2026.

If you’re in Oregon, Washington or Idaho, that’s the practical shape of it. One of these two has a published answer for your state. The other doesn’t.

Financial strength, named and dated

PURE. AM Best affirmed a Financial Strength Rating of A (Excellent) and Long-Term Issuer Credit Ratings of “a+” (Excellent) for Privilege Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange and PURE Specialty Exchange on July 29, 2026, stable outlook. Read past the letter grade. AM Best assesses the balance sheet as strong but describes operating performance as marginal, noting it “has shown improvement in recent periods.” It names two offsetting factors: the capital structure, which includes surplus notes from its parent, and reliance on reinsurance. Retrieved September 24, 2026. Worth flagging that PURE’s own website describes its rating as reflecting good operating performance. That isn’t the word AM Best used.

Openly’s companies. Openly itself has no financial strength rating, and nobody should hand it one. AM Best upgraded MS Transverse Insurance Company to A+ (Superior) from A (Excellent), and its Long-Term Issuer Credit Rating to “aa” (Superior), on June 20, 2025, stable outlook, covering MS Transverse Insurance Group. Retrieved September 24, 2026. Note that Openly’s own legal disclosures page still described MS Transverse as A (Excellent) when we checked on September 23, 2026, over a year after the upgrade. Openly describes Rock Ridge Insurance Company as an AM Best A- (Excellent) rated admitted carrier. We haven’t captured the date of the most recent AM Best action on Rock Ridge, so we’re not publishing one.

Service and loss prevention, where the two aren’t close

PURE publishes a substantial program. A risk manager home visit that includes an estimated cost to rebuild. A consultation called PURE360. Monitoring technology including Ting and LeakBot. A Wildfire Mitigation Program with automatic enrollment in wildfire-prone areas. The PURE Situation Room. A loss prevention allowance of up to $2,500 for eligible members after a significant loss, art services and a catastrophe response team. PURE attaches a qualifier that should travel with any description of it: “Loss prevention programs are available to select members in select states.”

Openly publishes nothing comparable in the material we reviewed. On a wildfire or water exposed house, that’s worth weighing.

The service record runs the other way. Our independent review of Openly documents a split picture. Strong coverage design on one side. On the other, a Better Business Bureau complaint file, a repeated pattern of large renewal increases with no claim behind them, cancellations and non-renewals driven by inspections, and a Kansas Insurance Department consent agreement and final order against Rock Ridge Insurance Company dated August 12, 2025, concerning cancellation and non-renewal notices that were never mailed. Read it before you buy.

We haven’t published the equivalent complaint analysis for PURE, and we’re not implying one exists. What PURE publishes about itself belongs here anyway: “when necessary, we have made the tough call to non-renew policies that no longer fit our criteria.” Owning part of the company doesn’t guarantee you a renewal. See high value home nonrenewal.

The questions that decide it

  1. Which entity is issuing this policy? With PURE, that’s either the admitted reciprocal or PURE Programs on surplus lines paper, and you want to know whether membership benefits come with it. With Openly, it’s Rock Ridge or MS Transverse.
  2. What does the dwelling settlement provision say in the actual form? Openly publishes its terms and its ten-state footnote. PURE’s aren’t published, so you’ll have to ask.
  3. What am I signing and contributing beyond premium, and for how long?
  4. Is my state on a published list, and is my total insured value near a cap?
  5. What happens after the first inspection, and at the first renewal?

These two suit different households, and that’s the honest end of it. Picture a well maintained home in an Openly state, owned by someone who wants published terms and no membership machinery. That’s a different client from a household that wants risk management services, an art schedule and a claim on surplus. Neither one wins in the abstract.

For a second read on a quote, compare your coverage or book a private client coverage review. Our PURE page goes deeper on the reciprocal model. How to compare high value home insurance quotes gives you the structure to run the two side by side.

Sources

PURE, About Us, Financial Strength, Reciprocal Model, Subscriber Savings Accounts and Risk Management pages at pureinsurance.com (retrieved September 23, 2026); PURE Specialty Exchange; PURE Programs, including the March 19, 2024 high value homeowners announcement. AM Best, PURE Insurance Group rating affirmation, July 29, 2026 (retrieved September 24, 2026). Openly, legal disclosures, homeowners coverage and agents pages (retrieved September 23, 2026). AM Best, MS Transverse rating upgrade, June 20, 2025 (retrieved September 24, 2026). Vantage Point Risk, Openly Insurance Review.

What many people don't realize

The part that catches owners off guard

  • This comparison is informational. It is not a statement that Vantage Point Risk is appointed with, or can place business with, either organization. Mention of an insurance company does not guarantee availability, appointment status, eligibility or placement.
  • Facts come from each organization's own published material, from AM Best rating actions, or from our previously published and reviewed Openly article, each named and dated.
  • Hugo Canizales, NPN 17110369, is the licensed technical reviewer of record for our property and casualty personal lines content. Verify any producer license through NIPR.
  • Neither organization publishes enough for a like-for-like settlement comparison. We say where the gap is instead of closing it with assumptions.
Free, two-minute check

See where your coverage stands

Answer a few quick questions and get a clear read on your current coverage in about two minutes. We flag what is worth a closer look.

Compare your coverage
A quick gut check

Where did your current coverage come from?

How you bought your policy shapes whether you are actually getting options. Three situations we see constantly:

A captive agent

If your policy came from an agent who represents one company, they cannot shop the market for you. You are seeing one company's answer, not your options.

Online, on your own

Online portals tend to optimize for the lowest price. That often means important coverages get quietly left out, and you do not find out until a claim.

An independent agent

The right setup, but only if they re-shop and review it. An independent agent who has not reviewed your coverage in years has stopped working for you.

See where you actually stand
When to review

It may be time for a coverage review if:

  • Your reconstruction estimate has crossed one million dollars and you are being shown two very different kinds of product
  • Someone presented a Subscriber Savings Account to you as a guaranteed return
  • You are in Washington and being told a carrier writes there
  • Your quote is on surplus lines paper and the membership benefits were part of the pitch
Compare your coverage Get a quote
Frequently asked

Frequently asked

What is the basic difference between PURE and Openly?
PURE is an insurance company. Openly is not. PURE Insurance is the marketing name for Privilege Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange, a Florida domiciled reciprocal insurer in which the policyholders are the members. Openly LLC describes itself as a general agency and program administrator offering policies underwritten by unaffiliated insurers, and states that each insurer is solely responsible for the claims on its policies. With PURE you join something. With Openly you buy a policy from a carrier you should ask to have named.
Is the PURE Subscriber Savings Account guaranteed money?
No, and PURE says so. PURE defines it as a notional account reflecting a member's share of policyholder surplus. PURE states that allocations are not guaranteed, are made at the discretion of management based on the performance of the business, and require regulatory approval. It states balances remain on PURE's balance sheet and can decrease, that funds are not accessible on demand, and that balances do not earn interest. PURE states it has made an allocation in 11 of its past 20 years in business.
Does PURE have a minimum home value and does Openly?
PURE publishes one: PURE is designed exclusively for homes insured for $1 million or more. Read the wording. It is insured for, meaning the cost to rebuild, not valued at, meaning market price. Openly publishes no dwelling minimum at all. Its high value framing is definitional, describing a home with a replacement cost significantly higher than standard properties because of size, location, materials or custom features.
Which one writes in Oregon, Washington and Idaho?
Openly publishes a state list. Oregon is live, Idaho is listed as coming soon as of September 2026, and Washington is not on the list. PURE publishes no admitted state list at all. What PURE does publish is that its Wildfire Mitigation Program is available to members in a list of states that includes Oregon, Washington and Idaho, which indicates members in those states but is a service list, not an appetite statement. PURE Specialty Exchange, the surplus lines side, has a published state list and none of those three states appear on it.
What are the AM Best ratings?
AM Best affirmed a Financial Strength Rating of A (Excellent) for Privilege Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange and PURE Specialty Exchange on July 29, 2026, stable outlook, together comprising PURE Insurance Group. Openly is not rated because it is not the insurer. Its carriers are. AM Best upgraded MS Transverse Insurance Company to A+ (Superior) from A (Excellent) on June 20, 2025. Rock Ridge Insurance Company is described by Openly as AM Best A- (Excellent) rated. Both AM Best releases were retrieved on September 24, 2026.
Is Openly's guaranteed replacement cost really unlimited?
No. Openly's own agent material says guaranteed replacement coverage up to $5M, and the footnote reads: in CT, GA, KS, MS, MO, NH, OH, SC, TN and WI, coverage amount is subject to Coverage A and conditions listed in the policy. In those ten states it is not an open ended promise. Oregon is not on that list. We were not able to source PURE's own settlement wording from its published material, so we are not comparing the two directly.
What are PURE Specialty Exchange and PURE Programs?
Separate entities from PURE itself. PURE Specialty Exchange is an Arizona domiciled domestic surplus lines reciprocal, introduced in March 2022, with its own attorney-in-fact. PURE Programs, LLC is a managing general underwriter, not a carrier. PURE Programs states in its own footer that policies arranged by PURE Programs may not confer the benefits of being a reciprocal exchange member including Subscriber or Member Savings Accounts. If the membership economics are your reason for choosing PURE, that sentence matters.
Can I buy either one directly?
No. PURE distributes through appointed independent brokers, runs a find a broker path for consumers, and tells consumers on its own risk management page to contact an independent broker for a quote. Openly distributes exclusively through independent agency partners, and its consumer quote link routes to an agency partner rather than to Openly. Both require a licensed intermediary.
How many properties can each cover?
Openly publishes a limit: it insures primary residences, secondary homes and rental properties up to nine, with each home requiring its own policy. PURE publishes a set of lines rather than a property count, including high value home, jewelry, art and collections, auto, personal excess liability, fraud and cyber, watercraft, flood, condo and co-op, and home systems protection. We do not have a published PURE property count, so ask.
RS
Written and reviewed by

Founder and Principal Advisor, Vantage Point Risk

Richard Sweet runs Vantage Point Risk, an independent insurance and risk advisory for property owners, real estate investors, business owners, and families. He works with investors every week on the coverage decisions that decide how a claim actually turns out, and writes the Learning Center to put those decisions in plain language.

Reviewed for insurance accuracy by Hugo Canizales, licensed agent, NPN 17110369. Published September 24, 2026. See our editorial process. Spot an error? Email support@vantagepointrisk.com.

Richard also writes The Vantage Point, notes on building a better business.

This article is general information, not insurance, legal, or tax advice. Coverage depends on your policy terms, endorsements, carrier underwriting, and the state you are in. Carrier products, ratings, state lists and disclosures change. Mention of an insurance company does not guarantee availability, appointment status, eligibility, or placement. For guidance on your specific situation, talk with a licensed advisor.

Related resources

Keep going.

Related

Openly Insurance Review: Ratings, Complaints, and Claims

An independent agency's read on Openly. Where the BBB letter grade and the review score disagree, what the complaint file actually says, and the 10-state limit on its headline coverage feature.

Related

Chubb vs PURE: How the Two High Value Home Insurers Actually Differ

A structural comparison of Chubb and PURE for high value homes. Stock insurer group against member owned reciprocal exchange, what each carrier publishes about settlement, eligibility and ratings, and the three PURE entities most write-ups blur together.

Related

Chubb vs Openly: Two Different Answers to the Same High Value Home Problem

Chubb is the insurer. Openly is a program administrator on someone else's paper. Here is how their published settlement language, limits, state footprints and caps actually differ, with the ratings named and dated.

Related

Extended vs Guaranteed Replacement Cost

When a rebuild costs more than your dwelling limit, extended and guaranteed replacement cost are what stand between you and the gap. Here is how each works, what they require, and why they matter most after a widespread disaster.

Related

Dwelling Coverage vs Market Value: Why They Are Not the Same

Your dwelling limit should reflect what it costs to rebuild your home, not what it would sell for. Here is why market value, purchase price, tax value, and loan balance are the wrong numbers, and what actually drives rebuild cost.

Related

Is Private Client Insurance Worth It? An Honest Weighing

Broader policy terms, household coordination, risk services and service expectations weighed against higher premium and more underwriting, with a fit and not fit table and a plain statement of who should not bother.

Compare your coverage

It's not a quote. It's a real review.

Answer a few quick questions and get a clear read in about two minutes. We will flag what is worth a closer look, and you can hand us your current policy if you want us to dig in. No pressure, no obligation.

We review your current coverage for gaps and overlaps
We compare the market to see if you are overpaying
We tell you what is actually worth changing, and what is not
You get clear answers, even when you are already covered well