A fraudulent wire is the most likely large loss in a real estate practice, and the worst time to learn which policy covers it is after the money is gone. The answer is genuinely not obvious: a wire-fraud loss can touch E&O, cyber, or crime and fidelity coverage, depending on how it happened and how each policy is worded. Here is how to think it through.
What each policy is built for
E&O covers your professional mistakes, so it responds to an allegation that your negligence caused a client harm, not to the theft of the funds themselves. Cyber is built around the breach, the compromised email, and the incident response. Crime and fidelity is built around theft and deception, including being tricked into sending money. A stolen wire can implicate all three, but only cyber or crime is designed to actually reimburse the lost funds.
Why the gap forms
Most firms carry one of cyber or crime and assume it covers funds-transfer fraud completely. In practice, social-engineering and funds-transfer losses are split between the two policies, often with sublimits and specific trigger language. Carry only one, or fail to check the wording, and the most likely loss in your business can land in the space between them.
How to close it
Review cyber and crime together rather than in isolation, confirm the funds-transfer and social-engineering sublimits are meaningful, and make sure the trigger language matches how real estate wire fraud actually unfolds. The objective is a clear, advance answer to which policy pays, so a loss becomes a claim instead of a dispute.
Prevention still comes first
No coverage analysis replaces the verification habit. A callback to a known number before any wire, staff training, and written procedures stop most fraud before a policy is ever tested. Our wire fraud prevention guide covers the controls, and a coverage review confirms where your funds exposure actually lands.