A consultant does not have to hold a listing to get sued. The claim is that an opinion, a feasibility study, a valuation view, a development recommendation, was wrong and a client relied on it. That is professional liability, and it is the coverage built for advisory work, not the general liability most office policies lead with.
Ready for terms? Get a quote. Want to find the gaps first? Compare your coverage.
The recurring consultant claim is professional negligence in an opinion: a feasibility study that missed a constraint, a valuation a lender or investor leaned on, a recommendation that did not hold. Because consulting work is relied on by parties who may not be your direct client, the exposure can arrive from a direction you did not expect. Layer in the data and email exposure of handling client information, and the picture is professional and digital, not premises-based.
The base is professional liability written for your actual services, with the policy's definition of professional services matching the advisory work you do and your prior-acts coverage intact. Cyber covers the client data and communications; general liability or a BOP handles ordinary office and premises risk. If you do litigation support or expert-witness work, the policy should address it expressly. The aim is a policy whose scope mirrors the work, so a reliance claim does not fall into a definitional gap.
Three recur: assuming that not brokering deals removes professional exposure, carrying a generic office policy that leads with general liability and treats professional services as an afterthought, and overlooking intended-use and expert-witness scope until a claim turns on it. Each is easy to fix once the policy is written around how a consultant actually delivers advice.
Take a few minutes and we will check that your professional liability matches your real services, confirm your prior-acts coverage and intended-use exposure, and flag where a reliance claim would find a gap.
Tell us how you consult and we will give you a straight read on whether the policy's scope actually matches the work you deliver.