The classic home inspector claim is simple and recurring: you missed a defect, or did not report it clearly enough. That is what inspector E&O is built around, and it is why a strong pre-inspection agreement, while useful, does not solve the problem on its own.
Ready for terms? Get a quote. Want to find the gaps first? Compare your coverage.
The dominant risk is the missed or under-reported defect that surfaces after closing as a demand letter. Beyond that, inspectors face bodily-injury and property-damage exposure on site, contract and scope disputes, and cyber risk through the photos, reports, and client data they handle. Ancillary services, radon, sewer scopes, mold, thermal imaging, water testing, expand both the revenue and the liability, and exclusions can leave wide gaps if the coverage does not contemplate them.
E&O sized to your volume and the services you actually perform is the core, with general liability for on-site injury and damage, and cyber for the data you store. The key is matching the E&O to your full scope, including ancillary services, so a radon or sewer-scope claim is not excluded. Where your state requires E&O for licensure, the policy also has to meet those terms.
The most common is believing a strong pre-inspection agreement alone solves the liability; it helps, but it does not replace E&O, and courts do not always enforce it as written. The second is adding ancillary services without confirming the coverage extends to them. The third is overlooking the on-site general-liability and cyber exposure entirely.
Take a few minutes and we will check your E&O against your volume and services, your on-site liability, and your state requirement, and flag where a missed-defect claim would land.
Tell us how your business works and we will give you a straight read on where a claim would find a gap.